Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)

Variable Interest Entities and Consolidated Real Estate Not Owned

 v2.3.0.11
Variable Interest Entities and Consolidated Real Estate Not Owned
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2011
Variable Interest Entities and Consolidated Real Estate Not Owned [Abstract]  
VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES AND CONSOLIDATED REAL ESTATE NOT OWNED
NOTE 3 — VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES AND CONSOLIDATED REAL ESTATE NOT OWNED
We enter into option and purchase agreements for land or lots as part of the normal course of business. These option and purchase agreements enable us to acquire properties at one or multiple future dates at pre-determined prices. These acquisition structures reduce our financial risk associated with land acquisitions and holdings and allow us to better maximize our cash position.
Based on the provisions of the relevant accounting guidance, we have concluded that when we enter into an option or purchase agreement to acquire land or lots from an entity and pay a non-refundable deposit, a variable interest entity, or “VIE”, may be created because we are deemed to have provided subordinated financial support that will absorb some or all of an entity’s expected losses if they occur. We evaluate all option and purchase agreements for land to determine whether they are a VIE. ASC 810, Consolidations, requires that for each VIE, we assess whether we are the primary beneficiary and, if so, we will consolidate the VIE in our financial statements and reflect such assets and liabilities as “Real estate not owned.” The liabilities related to consolidated VIEs are excluded from our debt covenant calculations. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we had $1.4 million and $866,000, respectively, of assets identified as “Real estate not owned”. In order to assess if we are the primary beneficiary, we must first determine if we have the ability to control the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact its economic performance. Such activities include, but are not limited to, the ability to determine the budget and scope of land development work, if any; the ability to control financing decisions for the VIE; the ability to acquire additional land into the VIE or dispose of land in the VIE not under contract with Meritage; and the ability to change or amend the existing option contract with the VIE. If we are not determined to control such activities, we are not considered the primary beneficiary of the VIE. If we do have the ability to control such activities, we will continue our analysis by determining if we are also expected to absorb a potentially significant amount of the VIE’s losses or, if no party absorbs the majority of such losses, if we will benefit from potentially a significant amount of the VIE’s expected gains.
In substantially all cases, creditors of the entities with which we have option agreements have no recourse against us and the maximum exposure to loss in our option agreements is limited to non-refundable option deposits and any capitalized pre-acquisition costs. If we are the land developer, we are at risk for items over budget related to land development on property we have under option. In these cases, we have typically contracted to complete development at a fixed market cost on behalf of the land owner and any budget savings or shortfalls are borne by us. Some of our option deposits may be refundable to us if certain contractual conditions are not performed by the party selling the lots.
The table below presents a summary of our lots under option or contract at June 30, 2011 (dollars in thousands):
                         
                    Option/Earnest  
    Number of     Purchase     Money Deposits  
    Lots     Price     Cash  
 
                       
Option contracts recorded on balance sheet as Real estate not owned (1)
    30     $ 1,398     $ 100  
Option contracts not recorded on balance sheet — non-refundable deposits, committed (1)
    1,834       80,272       9,578  
Purchase contracts not recorded on balance sheet — non-refundable deposits, committed (1)
    279       13,092       1,259  
 
                       
Purchase contracts not recorded on balance sheet — refundable deposits, committed
    616       27,472       573  
 
                 
Total committed (on and off balance sheet)
    2,759       122,234       11,510  
 
                 
Purchase contracts not recorded on balance sheet — refundable deposits, uncommitted (2)
    1,310       52,788       400  
 
                 
Total uncommitted
    1,310       52,788       400  
 
                 
 
                       
Total lots under option or contracts
    4,069       175,022       11,910  
 
                 
 
                       
Total option contracts not recorded on balance sheet
    4,039     $ 173,624     $ 11,810 (3)
 
                 
 
(1)   Deposits are generally non-refundable except if certain contractual conditions fail or certain contractual obligations are not performed by the selling party.
 
(2)   Deposits are refundable at our sole discretion. We have not completed our acquisition evaluation process and we have not internally committed to purchase these lots.
 
(3)   Amount is reflected in our consolidated balance sheet in the line item “Deposits on real estate under option or contract” as of June 30, 2011.
Generally, our options to purchase lots remain effective so long as we purchase a pre-established minimum number of lots each month or quarter, as determined by the respective agreement. In nearly all of our option contracts, we have the right not to exercise our option to purchase the lots and forfeit our deposit without further consequences other than termination of the option contract. Accordingly, we do not consider the lot purchase price to be a firm contractual obligation. Although the pre-established number is typically structured to approximate our expected rate of home construction starts, during a weakened homebuilding market, as we have recently been experiencing, we may purchase lots at an absorption level that exceeds our sales and home starts pace to meet the pre-established minimum number of lots or we may try to restructure our original contract to include terms that more accurately reflect our revised sales pace expectations.